random title

We lost

George W Bush will have a second term in office. This is bad; at least, it is worse than if John Kerry got the job. I don't think Mr Kerry was the saviour of all mankind, but in my view he was far better qualified than Mr Bush.

Tomorrow, I'll explain why the Bush victory is a bad thing, and why I think John Kerry was better suited to win what has been referred to as “the war on terror”. But now, I must sleep.

Update: Tomorrow my ass... it turns out a document on international politics takes a while to write. It'll be done when it's done.

Comments

Claire:

DAVID WHY IS IT THAT YOU ARE NOT ASLEEP

GO TO SLEEP AT ONCE

EVERYBODY'S BLOG IS FILLED WITH BUSH BUSH BUSH

So dirty.

Posted at November 4, 2004 01:14 AM

Zoomtard:

Oooh. I look forward to hearing someone else tell me why a Bush presidency is a bad thing. Thank God. I might not have known on my own.

Bush is the greatest thing in the world.

Posted at November 4, 2004 01:16 AM

David Barrett:

Actually, I doubt Kerry would do what I'm going to suggest either... but I think he'd do something much closer to it than Bush.

Ultimately, Bush is fighting a fire in a waste-paper basket with petrol.

Posted at November 4, 2004 01:37 AM

Des "Swish Name" Traynor:

Its a shame the way hating bush got so uncool when everyone started doing it. I hated bush before he was famous.

To push myself up a notch I am gonna go around saying that I genuinely think he really is a good president, that will seperate me from the drones who idly follow michael moore into an abyss of ignorance.

Posted at November 4, 2004 06:16 PM

Kevin the Full Time Christian:

Would that waste-paper basket be a civilization war?

And I loved Michael Moore when he was fat.

Posted at November 4, 2004 08:12 PM

David Barrett:

I liked McDonalds before it went commercial.

Posted at November 4, 2004 08:16 PM

Phil "Civil Servant" Brennan:

I think that this blogpost is of critical importance. Its non-obvious content is mindblowing, and the other stuff like "winning what is called the war on terror" sounds like a modified version of bush rhetoric. So it seems you are on the bush and kerry bandwagons at the same time. Just to stay on topic, I liked the SWP before they went commercial. I'm annoying myself now.

Posted at November 5, 2004 11:34 AM

David Barrett:

I said it before, and I'll say it again; there ain't no party like a Bolshevik party.

Posted at November 5, 2004 01:34 PM

David Barrett:

One great thing about the Bush victory is that we'll have another four years of great episodes of the Daily Show.

Posted at November 6, 2004 12:29 AM

Anonymous:

Amen to that.

It's a pity about John McCain though.
As you said, he does seem like a genuinely decent guy but he's damaged goods as far as the voting public is concerned.

Vanity Fair had a very good article this month on how McCain's reputation was well and truly fUx0r3d by Karl Rove and the Christian Coalition.
How, in 2000, he was blasted with all this shit of having fathered an illegitimate black child and recently, when he came out in defense of John Kerry, his own party accused him of being 'mentally unstable' due to his having served in Vietnam.

Topic? I used to like the KGB before they went mainstream. The underground shit they pulled in the Boshevik days is still off the hook though, fo' sho'.

Posted at November 7, 2004 01:23 AM
Copyright © 2003-2006 David Barrett. Valid XHTML & CSS.